 |
| Vista
Grande Drainage Basin
Alternatives Analysis
The
City of Daly City is preparing the Vista
Grande Drainage Basin Alternatives Analysis
based on the recommendations of the Vista
Grande Watershed Plan. The purpose of
the alternatives analysis is to develop
and evaluate alternatives that will reduce
or eliminate flooding, reduce erosion along
Lake Merced, and provide other potential
benefits such as habitat enhancement and
lake level augmentation. The Vista Grande
Drainage Basin Alternatives Draft Report
is available below. The recommended program
outlined in the plan includes construction
of a new stormwater tunnel, construction
of a detention basin in Westlake Park, and
potential for treatment wetlands in San
Francisco to treat stormwater for diversion
to Lake Merced.
|

|
Public
Meetings
The
City of Daly City hosted a public meeting on Wednesday,
September 17, 2008 at Larcombe Clubhouse (in Westlake
Park) to provide residents and interested stakeholders
with an update of the alternatives analysis associated
with the Vista Grande Drainage Basin. The
presentation is available here. Please
provide your comments on the Draft Report and
Supplemental Analyses by October 17, 2008.
The
City of Daly City held two public meetings on
February 21, 2008 and February 26, 2008 to provide
interested stakeholders with a summary of the
draft report. The
presentation is available here.
If you have any questions about the alternatives
analyses or the public meetings, please contact
Robert Ovadia at (650) 991-8266 or email rovadia@dalycity.org.
Vista
Grande Drainage Basin Alternatives Draft Report
Supplemental
Analyses (August 2008)
Supplemental
Alternatives Analyses Summary
Attachment
1 - Functional Design Criteria
Attachment
2 - Conceptual Design Figures
Attachment
3 - Budget Level Cost Estimate
Attachment
4 - Alternatives Evaluation
The
Draft Report by Section (December 2007):
- Title
Page and Table of Contents
-
- Title
- Distribution
- Table of Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- 1.
Executive Summary
- 2.
Introduction
-
- 2.1 - Purpose
- 2.2 - Project Background
- 2.3 - Previous Studies
- 2.4 - Ongoing Studies
- 2.5 - Acknowledgements
- 2.6 - Limitations
- 3.
Watershed Hydrology and System Hydraulics
-
- 3.1 - Watershed Description
- 3.2 - Preliminary Design Criteria
- 3.3 - Preliminary Hydraulic Evaluation
- 3.4 - Water Quality Improvements
- 4.
-Description of Alternatives
-
- 4.1 - Alternative 1A - Beginning of Canal
to New Outfall
- 4.2 - Alternative 4 - South of County
Line along Northgate Drive
- 4.3 - Alternative 5B - 1/3 up Canal to
Existing Outfall
- 4.4 - Alternative 6 - 2/3 up Canal to
Existing Outfall
- 4.5 - Alternative 7 - Parallel Tunnel
South of the Existing Tunnel
- 4.6 - Alternative 9 - Detention Basins
- 4.7 - Alternative 10 - Stormwater Re-Use
Opportunities
- 5
- Geologic and Geotechnical Assessments
-
- 5.1 - Regional and Site Study
- 5.2 - Regional Seismicity
- 5.3 - Geotechnical Literature Research
- 5.4 -Anticipated Subsurface Conditions
at Westlake Park
- 5.5 -Anticipated Ground Conditions for
New Tunnel
- 5.6 -Recommended Tunneling Methods
- 6
- Preliminary Assessment of Construction Method
and Constructability Issues
-
- 6.1 -Construction Approach
- 7
- Potential Utility Conflicts and Relocation
Requirements
-
- 7.1 - Electric Utilities
- 7.2 - Telephone
- 7.3 - Storm Drains
- 7.4 - Sanitary Sewer
- 7.5 - Water Pipelines
- 7.6 - Natural Gas Pipelines
- 8
- Preliminary Environmental Considerations
-
- 8.1 - Ecological Setting
- 8.2 - Overview of the Environmental Regulatory
Process
- 8.3 - Agency Consultations
- 8.4 - Environmental Characterization Assessment
of Alternative Tunnel Alignments
- 9
- Evaluation of Alternatives
-
- 9.1 - Review of Findings
- 9.2 - Screening Methodologies
- 9.3 - Preliminary Evaluation
- 9.4 - Sensitivity Analysis
- 10 -
Summary and Recommendations
-
- 10.1 - Summary
- 10.2 - Recommendations
- 11
- References
-
- 12
- Revision Log
-
- Appendices
-
|
| |
|